<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten NHL Players Who Need a Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/</link>
	<description>All things NHL. All the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:13:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Czarnik</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Czarnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>Please take Derek Meech. I would trade him for a used hockey sweater. He might have a good shot, but if I have to see him flub a pass to his defensive partner which is picked off by the opposing team (usually in enemy territory for a break away) I&#039;ll scream. Give me defense from my defenseman first and then we&#039;ll talk about offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please take Derek Meech. I would trade him for a used hockey sweater. He might have a good shot, but if I have to see him flub a pass to his defensive partner which is picked off by the opposing team (usually in enemy territory for a break away) I&#8217;ll scream. Give me defense from my defenseman first and then we&#8217;ll talk about offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puckbandit</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>puckbandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>I had another thought about Murphy. You wrote that a team &quot;in need of a puck moving defender could find him valuable.&quot; 

I guess there aren&#039;t many of those out there that feel he&#039;s a fit or they would have picked him up on waivers. I doubt anyone is going to offer up a trade for him anytime soon. 

I don&#039;t have a problem with Murphy, per se, and would like nothing better than for him, or any defenseman to light it up for the Devils. It&#039;s just that you seem to slant this article as if it&#039;s the team not suiting him, as in &quot;defensive minded, blah blah blah&quot; when at this point it&#039;s his play not suiting the team. As kstatik notes above, there&#039;s plenty of opportunity for EFFECTIVE puck moving defenseman on this team. 

 Again, they haven&#039;t given up on him completely or they wouldn&#039;t have called him up yesterday. I&#039;d rather they play Fraser tomorrow, but if it&#039;s Murphy, he&#039;ll get another chance to make that first, make that fourth, impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had another thought about Murphy. You wrote that a team &#8220;in need of a puck moving defender could find him valuable.&#8221; </p>
<p>I guess there aren&#8217;t many of those out there that feel he&#8217;s a fit or they would have picked him up on waivers. I doubt anyone is going to offer up a trade for him anytime soon. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with Murphy, per se, and would like nothing better than for him, or any defenseman to light it up for the Devils. It&#8217;s just that you seem to slant this article as if it&#8217;s the team not suiting him, as in &#8220;defensive minded, blah blah blah&#8221; when at this point it&#8217;s his play not suiting the team. As kstatik notes above, there&#8217;s plenty of opportunity for EFFECTIVE puck moving defenseman on this team. </p>
<p> Again, they haven&#8217;t given up on him completely or they wouldn&#8217;t have called him up yesterday. I&#8217;d rather they play Fraser tomorrow, but if it&#8217;s Murphy, he&#8217;ll get another chance to make that first, make that fourth, impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Ladysz</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafal Ladysz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>I know Murphy was given a look in training camp and this team obviously doesn&#039;t suit him too well which is why he needs a trade. Besides, a few games aren&#039;t enough to get a guy going he needs about 15-20 games to get some chemistry with the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Murphy was given a look in training camp and this team obviously doesn&#8217;t suit him too well which is why he needs a trade. Besides, a few games aren&#8217;t enough to get a guy going he needs about 15-20 games to get some chemistry with the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kstatik</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>kstatik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>Re: Murphy

Clearly you don&#039;t follow the Devils at all and you just skim all of your NJD news from OTHER mainstream media who ALSO don&#039;t bother to follow the team...

Murphy was given a look in training camp as well as saw action in a few games as the #6 &#039;D&#039; in which NJ lost and Murphy created nothing! Lemaire told Murphy he would have to produce (namely on the PP) to remain up with the team. He did not!

Lemaire has also stated his intention to keep the focus on offense (as Sutter did) last season, only shoring up their holes defensively which he has followed through with. He has also made it VERY obvious that he does not want his team sitting on a lead and has the offense *going* - it started off kind of slowly, but the usual sources (Parise &amp; Zajac namely although Bergfors is starting to play more confidently too) are producing shots &amp; *points*. NJ is playing a transition game this season which you might know if you watched a game... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Murphy</p>
<p>Clearly you don&#8217;t follow the Devils at all and you just skim all of your NJD news from OTHER mainstream media who ALSO don&#8217;t bother to follow the team&#8230;</p>
<p>Murphy was given a look in training camp as well as saw action in a few games as the #6 &#8216;D&#8217; in which NJ lost and Murphy created nothing! Lemaire told Murphy he would have to produce (namely on the PP) to remain up with the team. He did not!</p>
<p>Lemaire has also stated his intention to keep the focus on offense (as Sutter did) last season, only shoring up their holes defensively which he has followed through with. He has also made it VERY obvious that he does not want his team sitting on a lead and has the offense *going* &#8211; it started off kind of slowly, but the usual sources (Parise &amp; Zajac namely although Bergfors is starting to play more confidently too) are producing shots &amp; *points*. NJ is playing a transition game this season which you might know if you watched a game&#8230; <img src='http://thehockeywriters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puckbandit</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4271</link>
		<dc:creator>puckbandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4271</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the Devils give Murphy a look by 1) signing him and 2) having him play in a few before sending him down? And now that they brought him back up after Martin&#039;s injury aren&#039;t they giving him another look? 

The problem with being a small offensive defenseman is that you need to help out the offense when given the chance. Fact is, NJ has a few of these guys who are interchangeable. Maybe a trade will eventually benefit both sides if things don&#039;t change or if he gets sent back down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the Devils give Murphy a look by 1) signing him and 2) having him play in a few before sending him down? And now that they brought him back up after Martin&#8217;s injury aren&#8217;t they giving him another look? </p>
<p>The problem with being a small offensive defenseman is that you need to help out the offense when given the chance. Fact is, NJ has a few of these guys who are interchangeable. Maybe a trade will eventually benefit both sides if things don&#8217;t change or if he gets sent back down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Ladysz</title>
		<link>http://thehockeywriters.com/ten-nhl-players-who-need-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-4269</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafal Ladysz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehockeywriters.com/?p=10627#comment-4269</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mention anything about Murphy&#039;s age. I mentioned he has offensive upside and that a team in need of a puck moving defender could find him valuable. My point is he can put up points on the back end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mention anything about Murphy&#8217;s age. I mentioned he has offensive upside and that a team in need of a puck moving defender could find him valuable. My point is he can put up points on the back end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
