Canucks News & Rumours: Lankinen, Boeser, Buium & Something Positive?

Item One: The Gap Between the Kings and the Canucks Was Obvious
Item Two: Once Again, Lankinen Deserved Better
Item Three: The Little Mistakes Added Up for the Canucks
Item Four: One Canucks Positive? At Least There Was Some Fire
What’s Next for the Canucks?

Some nights, there isn’t much mystery to solve. On Thursday, the Vancouver Canucks were shut out 4–0, and the game told us exactly what happened, whether we want to hear it or not. The Los Angeles Kings came in desperate, clinging to playoff hopes, and they played like it. The Canucks? They looked like a team playing out the string.

That’s not meant as a knock as much as an observation. One team had urgency; the other was trying to build something for later. But when those two realities meet on the same ice, it can look like this—lopsided, frustrating, and, at times, a little hard to sit through.

Item One: The Gap Between the Kings and the Canucks Was Obvious

There wasn’t anything surprising about how this game unfolded. The Kings are one point out of the second wild-card spot in the Western Conference, and they played like it—heavy on pucks, strong along the boards, and relentless in the second period when the game slipped away. The Kings owned the ice all night long.

Filip Hronek Vancouver Canucks — Vancouver Canucks defenceman Filip Hronek played over 25 minutes last night.
(Bob Frid-Imagn Images)

The numbers backed it up. Shot attempts were wildly tilted, and the Canucks spent long stretches defending instead of dictating. When a team like the Kings start winning those little battles, everything else follows—zone time, momentum, and eventually, goals. Vancouver couldn’t match that level, and maybe right now, they’re not built to.

Item Two: Once Again, Lankinen Deserved Better

If this game had any chance of being close, it was because of Kevin Lankinen. He made 34 saves and, for a while, kept things from getting out of hand. LA’s first goal came off a deflection, the second off a breakdown in coverage, and by then the ice was already starting to tilt too far.

That’s been the theme. Vancouver’s goaltending gives them a chance, but the details in front of the net don’t hold up. Screens, tips, missed assignments—it all adds up. Asking young forwards to handle defensive responsibilities like seasoned veterans is a tough assignment, and nights like this show just how unforgiving that learning curve can be.

Item Three: The Little Mistakes Added Up for the Canucks

A dozen small moments told this story. A puck not getting deep. A tired defenceman stuck on the ice. A turnover at the wrong time—like the one from Jake DeBrusk that led to the third goal. None of them feels huge on its own, but together they snowballed.

Brock Boeser Vancouver Canucks — Vancouver Canucks forward Brock Boeser (Bob Frid-Imagn Images)

Brock Boeser said it best after the game—awareness matters. Knowing when to simplify, when to help a teammate, and when to just get the puck out. Those are habits, and right now, they’re inconsistent. That’s not unusual for a team in this position, but it has to change if the group wants to take a step forward.

Item Four: One Canucks Positive? At Least There Was Some Fire

If there was one thing to take from last night’s contest, it was that the Canucks didn’t go quietly. The late-game scrum, the pushing and shoving, even the first career fight from Zeev Buium, showed a bit of emotion. Maybe even a bit of pride.

It’s not a substitute for good hockey, but it’s something. Young players like Tom Willander and Buium are showing they care and are willing to push back on matters in their own way. As frustrating as the result was, those moments at least hint at a group that hasn’t completely checked out.

What’s Next for the Canucks?

The Canucks are at the stage where results matter less than direction. They’ve been eliminated from the playoffs, the standings are what they are, and now it’s about figuring out what carries forward. Effort, habits, identity—those are the things that have to be sorted out before next season.

Because games like this don’t just disappear. They leave a mark, a reminder of how far there is to go. The Kings showed what a motivated, structured team looks like. The Canucks saw it up close. Now the question is whether they can take something from it—beyond just the final score—and start building toward something better.