Maple Leafs News & Rumors: Andersen, Hyman & Confusing Information

In this editon of Toronto Maple Leafs News & Rumors, I’ll comment on what seems to be confusing information about two of the team’s unrestricted free agents – Frederik Andersen and Zach Hyman. If you’re a fan of the team and want to know where these players will land next season – and what Maple Leafs’ fan doesn’t – the information can be confounding. Even the hockey pundits can’t agree on what the rumors mean.

For LeBrun, the bottom line was that Andersen’s considering coming back and there’s a chance he might. Funny then that Jon Steitzer, who’s the Managing Editor of The Leafs Nation, quoted LeBrun and then outlined why that report suggested Andersen would be leaving for sure. The title of his article was “A farewell to Freddie? It certainly seems that way.”

Funny how that works. My point is that it’s an odd time for NHL hockey fans to know what might be accurate and what’s likely not accurate. I’ll try to explain more about that in Item Two.

Item Two: The Interesting Space Created before the Seattle Kraken Expansion Draft

When an NHL fan reads the rules of the July 21 Expansion Draft coming, it’s easy enough to understand that a team can protect a certain number of players. For example, the rule says that NHL teams can (a) protect seven forwards, three defensemen and one goalie or (b) eight skaters (forwards/defensemen) and one goalie. That’s straightforward and understandable.

However, there’s another aspect to the expansion draft that’s more complicated, and that involves NHL teams re-signing their own free agents (or not yet re-signing them). NHL general managers know the 2021-22 salary cap ceiling will remain flat at $81.5 million; yet, to date, few teams have signed their own pending UFAs. Usually, they’d hope to avoid the chance of a bidding war.

However, with the expansion draft looming and the free agent market opening on July 28, few NHL teams have re-signed their own pending UFAs. Then, factor in that the Kraken get a jump on the market with a 48-hour UFA negotiation window July 18-20. Why the hesitancy to ink these contracts? The answer is simple: every UFA re-signed now exposes another roster player to the Kraken at the draft.

Additionally, there’s no doubt that the space created by the Seattle Kraken expansion draft is keeping a lid on leaks emerging from the different organizations. But that space also might also generate a plethora of false information floating around. The recent confusing information about Andersen’s staying or leaving is a minor example.

It’s illegal for NHL teams to sign and not report contracts. With the expansion draft is looming. That would be misconduct. But who’s to say a team and a player might not have an unspoken “wink-of-an-agreement” that both sides know can’t be signed until after the expansion draft?

Each NHL team can legally protect a certain number of players from being drafted by the Kraken. But it’s also true that teams need not protect UFAs who are – ostensibly – on the open market. But if a UFA clearly wants to stay put and his “former” team knows it, why sign that player prior to the draft and risk exposing another roster player?

Take Zach Hyman for example, rumors are hot and heavy that the team and Hyman are far apart in their negotiations. In fact, that could be accurate. However, that also pushes the narrative toward a sort of logical conclusion that Hyman will test free agency. In fact, that’s exactly what Elliotte Friedman reported recently.

Specifically, Friedman reported that Hyman and the Maple Leafs were far apart in their contract negotiations with free agency approaching. Friedman on FAN 960’s The Big Show he reported, “Sounds like he’s testing the market.” He added, “I heard they were significantly far apart.”

The remainder of the report noted the redundant speculation that Hyman would likely be able to sign for $5 million somewhere else on the open market. That prompted even more redundant considerations about a “hometown discount” or a “change in the contract numbers.” The landing spot was that Hyman would test free agency later this month. 

There’s no issue with Friedman for reporting this information. I think he’s a straight-up hockey pundit who tells the truth. I’m sure that’s exactly what he heard. That said, I also believe there’s no reason for the Maple Leafs to dispute any information that their negotiations with Hyman remain “far apart.”

Even if it were false, why say? If the team had the nuance of an agreement with Hyman, why take a chance that anyone can accuse you of collusion or misconduct? Free agency or not, if you knew he were going to stay, why not wait a few days?

I’m not saying that Hyman and the Maple Leafs have any kind of an agreement. It probably behooves both sides to wait to see what happens. My point is that the expansion draft has created a time when what fans might read or hear should be considered within the context of the space in which it’s heard.

What’s Next for the Maple Leafs?

Specifically, given what I’ve written in this post, I think it’s unlikely the Maple Leafs will make more roster moves soon. Signing Jason Spezza and Wayne Simmonds seems safe enough because they’re unlikely to be drafted by the Kraken.

Even if there are secrets – and, I’m not saying there are, these will likely stay in house until after the draft. The expansion draft is interesting because it opens the chance that team team might lose players. It’s always a risk; however, it also offers opportunities for a team to protect its UFAs without actually doing so formally.

I’m really looking forward to see who Seattle chooses and what pre-draft deals will be revealed during that time.