The Toronto Maple Leafs showed plenty of fight against Utah on Tuesday night, but they couldn’t quite finish the job. After falling behind 3-0, Toronto battled back, created chances, and made things interesting late in the game. The problem was that the hole was too deep. The Maple Leafs eventually lost 5-4, despite a strong push that left them with opportunities to find the equalizer.
There were positives to take from the performance, especially the response when things looked bleak. Toronto also came away from its road trip with a win over Colorado and a point in Vegas. Still, the comeback against Utah raised a familiar question: how much energy should this team have to spend rescuing games it has made difficult for itself?
Two storylines stand out as the Maple Leafs return home: their inability to escape early deficits and Jim Hiller’s decision once again to dress 11 forwards and seven defencemen.
The Maple Leafs Kept Making Things So Difficult
There’s something encouraging about the Maple Leafs’ comeback against Utah. Unable to guard against the rush, they fell behind early. Yet, Toronto kept pushing and eventually got close enough to make the final minutes uncomfortable for the Mammoth. The offence came alive, the top players helped carry the load, and the Maple Leafs gave themselves a chance to steal a point. That resilience matters, particularly for a team still trying to establish its identity under Jim Hiller.

But there’s another side to the story. Toronto has spent too much time lately trying to climb out of holes, and against Utah, turnovers proved costly. The Mammoth are built around speed and transition, and mistakes in the neutral zone or near the blue lines can quickly turn into dangerous rushes. Toronto needs to know when to simplify its game, get pucks deep, and avoid the risky passes that let fast opponents attack before the defence can get organized.
The Maple Leafs can’t count on making every game interesting in the third period. The talent is there to generate offence, but better starts and smarter puck management would make a considerable difference. The comeback was encouraging, but the bigger goal is to give themselves a chance to win without first overcoming a multi-goal deficit.
Jim Hiller’s 11-Forward, Seven-Defenceman Experiment Has Advantages
Hiller’s decision to dress 11 forwards and seven defencemen offers some interesting possibilities. Toronto can give Auston Matthews, William Nylander, and John Tavares extra shifts, while the coaching staff has more flexibility to adjust its forward combinations. It can also make line matching more difficult for opposing coaches, especially when the Maple Leafs can put some of their top offensive players on the ice in unexpected situations.

(John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images)
The challenge is what happens on defence. Young and lower-pairing defencemen may struggle to establish a rhythm if their shifts become irregular. I listened to the radio broadcast last night rather than watch on television. Anthony Stewart suggested that Hiller wants to manage workloads carefully, rather than asking developing players to handle more minutes than they’re ready for. There’s some logic to that approach. Giving a young defenceman manageable minutes in situations where he can succeed may be more useful than throwing him into a demanding role before he’s ready.
The question is whether this arrangement can work long term. It may be a reasonable way to manage the roster while Toronto deals with injuries and evaluates its options, but the team still needs to learn what it has on the blue line. If dressing one fewer forward helps keep the top players fresh without limiting the development of young defencemen, the experiment could pay off. If the seventh defenceman barely plays, however, Hiller will need to weigh the benefits against the drawbacks.
What’s Next for the Maple Leafs?
The immediate priority is breaking the habit of falling behind early. Toronto has shown it can score and compete when the pressure rises, but the team needs to bring that urgency to the opening minutes. Hiller will want to see better defensive coverage, fewer costly turnovers, and a more consistent effort across all three periods. The comeback against Utah should provide some confidence, but the Maple Leafs can’t afford to treat resilience as a substitute for playing a complete game.
The lineup experiment will also be worth watching as the schedule continues. Injuries may influence how long Hiller sticks with 11 forwards and seven defencemen, and Toronto still needs to find the right balance between using its veteran stars and developing younger players. No one needs to solve every roster question overnight. For now, the Maple Leafs need to build on the positives from their road trip, tighten up defensively, and find a way to make their next comeback unnecessary.
Free Newsletter
Get Toronto Maple Leafs coverage delivered to your inbox
In-depth analysis, breaking news, and insider takes - free.
Subscribe Free →