Vigneault Channels Inner Torts Through Defensive Absences

Part of what was frustrating for many Ranger fans during the John Tortorella era in New York, among other things, was his seldom willingness to allow line mates to settle in, jell, and build chemistry with one-another. The arrival of Alain Vigneault as head coach was a breath of fresh air for hockey fans in Manhattan in the sense that Vigneault, on the opposite end of the spectrum from Tortorella, was all about keeping line mates together, even if it took them a few games to figure things out in order to find chemistry.

However, given the current state of the Rangers defense, Vigneault was forced during Monday’s game against the St. Louis Blues to channel his inner Torts, and put on a hockey version of the Ringling Brothers Circus by mixing, matching, and juggling his defensive pairings in nearly every way possible.

A Skeleton of What Once Was

New York Rangers Defenseman Conor Allen (#37) (Josh Smith/THW)
New York Rangers Defenseman Conor Allen (#37) (Josh Smith/THW)

With the absences of Boyle, Moore, McDonagh, and Klein at the blue line, the Rangers were playing without four of their top-six defenseman. This resulted in Matt Hunwick and Mike Kostka playing top-four defensive minutes, while Dylan McIlrath and Conor Allen (combined five NHL games experience prior to last night), rounded out the Rangers’ top-six.

Do you really need to know anything else?

Lucky for the Rangers, Hunwick and Kostka really rose to the occasion Monday night, as did the entire group of Ranger forwards, as their collective relentless forecheck, coupled with the big defensive effort and 31 saves from Cam Talbot, helped the Blueshirts earn one point as they eventually fell to St. Louis in a shootout.

Hunwick even earned the primary assist on Chris Kreider’s first period power play goal, as Kreider deflected his shot from the point past Blues goaltender Brian Elliot.

However, it didn’t change the fact that Alain Vigneault still had to be very diligent in order to not to have the wrong defensive pair out at the wrong time. He also had to, in a sense, shelter the recent call-ups in Dylan McIlrath and Conor Allen.

While Allen played just fine in his 13:03 of ice time, McIlrath was less-than stellar. The former first round draft pick of the Rangers had just over eight minutes of ice time Monday, but spent nine minutes in the penalty box. He also fought St. Louis forward Ryan Reaves during the first period, a fight which Vigneault later commented on, saying that he isn’t sure “how much room is left in the game for that now.”

Bottom line? It was a useless fight, and McIlrath didn’t make a very strong case for himself to stay with the big club.

For Vigneault though, this all still resulted in him needing to mix and match the defensive pairings all night long.

Organized Chaos

The Rangers started the evening with Staal being paired with Kostka, Girardi with Allen, and Hunwick with McIlrath. McIlrath went on to play with Allen, Staal, and Kostka. Hunwick, who started with McIlrath, went on the play with Girardi, Staal and Kostka. Allen, who started with Girardi, proceeded to play with McIlrath. Eventually, even Staal and Girardi got a chance to play with each other.

Making your head spin yet?

Vigneault didn’t really have a choice, though. With his penalties, McIlrath essentially put the Rangers down to five defenseman for a large portion of the evening, so it took a “Tortorellian” type effort from the Ranger head coach to patch up all the holes.

And as spot on as Vigneault was for the majority of the night, he did have one lapse in judgment which cost the Rangers. When Vladimir Tarasenko tied the game at one on the power play during the second period, Mike Kostka and Dylan McIlrath, not exactly your shutdown duo, both wound up on the penalty kill at the same time. How that happened is beyond me, and probably beyond almost every Ranger fan on the planet, but it happened, and the Blues made the Rangers pay.

I suppose when you aren’t John Tortorella, some can just slip through the cracks.

Reunited and Looking Forward

It should’ve come as a surprise to nobody that when Staal and Girardi did finally get the chance to play alongside one another, albeit for a short time, the two blue liners arguably played their best hockey of the night, as they helped the Rangers kill off a big penalty during the third period of the game (Why they weren’t also on during Tarasenko’s second period goal is questionable). Due to the circumstances, though, that was not commonplace during Monday’s game, and probably won’t be moving forward into Wednesday’s game against the Red Wings.

In a night where the focus was in large part on the Rangers blue line, two parts of the Rangers offensive game that should not go unmentioned were, one, the play and chemistry of Rick Nash and Martin St. Louis. St. Louis score twice last night in the losing effort, with one of his goals coming off of a gorgeous cross-ice feed from Rick Nash.

And two, was the play of the newly established Kreider-Hayes-Stempniak line. On a couple of occasions during the third period, those three were absolutely electrifying, including one net-mouth scramble where there seemed to be a force field around Brian Elliot which somehow kept the puck out of the net. If Vigneault decides that it is a line worth holding onto, that could without a doubt be a trio to be reckoned with in future games.

As of this moment, it’s very unlikely that Kevin Klein will return to the Rangers lineup on Wednesday against Detroit. Chances are pretty good that Vigneault will again need to put forth his best Tortorella impression in order to go back to work with the depleted defensive core of the New York Rangers.

6 thoughts on “Vigneault Channels Inner Torts Through Defensive Absences”

  1. William Mc
    Now there in lies the rub. Why would AV, or any coach in this league need to borrow anything from any coach, let alone Tortorella. A comparison is such that, this guy did this, but this guy did that, or this also. However this isn’t a comparison, it’s conjecture. It’s Jake’s supposition that AV is doing a Torts impersonation now because there is a similar situation in depth and injuries facing the team at this juncture. Don’t all coaches have to do this at some point? Are they all channeling Torts? See what I’m getting at, there’s no basis for this article other than to mention a coach who didn’t take us any further than the guy we have now, and did a one-and-done with Vancouver.

  2. Jake, I give you much respect for putting your words out there for all to see and critique. It’s not as easy thing to do. That being said, I may have not been so eloquent in my response to your article (lol). So let me try this again. My contention is that AV is just as much a COACH as Tortorella. As a matter of fact, between his NHL experience and other coaching experience in general, he has 24 years total. I think he’s developed his own ideas and techniques by now. Every coach juggles lines. Sometimes they do a lot of the same things. The correlation being made between AV having to do it should not be that AV is channeling his inner Torts. One should not be synonymous with the other. It seemed to me as a way to bring 2 people together that aren’t really anything alike. All you would need to do is be present at a post-game press conference for both of them to know how different they are. Here we are a year and a half removed from the Torts era, and someone is still talking about him. On top of that, trying to make him something of a guru, that our new coach needs to channel this guy’s spirit to get thru this tough stretch of injuries and depth issues. That is how I feel you do AV an injustice. Agree to disagree I guess my friend.

    • I appreciate your critique. What would hockey writing and sports journalism/editorial writing be without differing opinions? And I thank you for the critiques. The only way for me to improve is take critiques and feedback in stride…

      Now sure, every coach juggles lines, and Tortorella did it far more than most coaches do. My comparison to Torts was made because of just how much Vigneault was foreced to shuffle the D-pairs due to the injuries/suspension to Moore. It wasn’t my intention to come across as a full on comparison of coaching styles. With Torts having been the most recent NYR coach prior to AV, it was easy to make the connection after Monday’s shuffle fest. I think AV is a great fit for NY. The players seem to like playing for him. He’s very respectful to the media. He’s a very good, independent minded coach. The shuffling around on Monday just felt a little reminiscent of the Tortorella days, and so I wrote about it. Thanks a lot for reading my article, even if you may not have agreed with it, and thanks for reading the hockey writers!

  3. Given their polar opposite coaching styles, it’s perfectly reasonable to compare AV to Torts, especially at this time. If Jake were comparing him to Emile Francis or Keenan, you might have a case for griping.

    Joe, you say the article does AV an injustice, I think it’s quite the opposite. Vigneault can borrow from Torts’ playbook, I’m not so sure the reverse is true.

  4. Can we stop with all the Tortorella crap already. Channeling his inner Torts…..? So anybody who coaches for the Rangers AND juggles lines from now on will be compared to Torts? This article does Vigneault an injustice. Torts shuffled lines incessantly because he didn’t trust his players, because he was an erratic coach. He was never short-sighted, he was never at fault, and whenever someone didn’t execute to his wishes they were either benched, publicly lambasted or both. Saying that Vigneault, by now having to shuffle lines out of necessity due to big injuries to key players, is channeling his inner Torts is just silly. Vigneault will have to put forth his best Tortorella impression blah blah..really???? Did you read this before you published it?

    • Sorry you feel this way. Never did I say it was a mistake for AV to shuffle the lines. It was undoubtedly out of necessity. Line shuffling was something Torts was known for, and with the amount it occurred the other night against St. Louis, the small comparison was made. I also happen to think Torts did a lot of good during his time with the Rangers. Things went downhill fast for him when he eventually was let go, but he brought a team to game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals that I don’t think was necessarily ready to be there yet. I don’t think AV is Torts. I think they are two very different coaches. The line shuffling though, out of necessity, was a little reminiscent. Maybe we can agree to disagree.

Comments are closed.