Leafs Can Be Cup Competitors Without Rebuilding

The Leafs might look like a team in disarray right now, having lost a significant number of games recently and fired their coach. Beyond that, their best player is taking a ton of heat (98.75% of which is undeserved) and whether it’s the saluting scandal or Bernier’s lack of knowledge about world history, the season has been like one long soap-opera and it’s not even half way over.

The question everyone is asking is: where do does the team go from here?

Rebuild? Start over? Keep going down the same path?

I’m not even going to go into how many times I’ve heard “the core” annoyingly referenced this week. As if a team without a top-line centre or defensmen even has a core.

But I have pondered over the question of whether or not to rebuild all year. I have, at various times, recommended the team go after Mike Richards, Tyler Myers or Keith Yandle. I have also suggested trading Kessel and tanking the season to rebuild around Rielly, Kadri, Bernier and whoever those moves bring in. So you’re excused if you’ve been following along and think I’m a bit schizophrenic – but all these really are are thought exercises and I don’t believe the Leafs SHOULD trade Kessel, I was just suggesting that it’s an idea to consider. And they should consider it, but then they should reject it because you just don’t find guys with his talent every day.

So, with that in mind, here’s what I would do if I was the Leafs GM today.

1. Kadri is now officially the number one centre.

(Steven Christy/OKC Barons)
(Steven Christy/OKC Barons)

There is no question that Nazem Kadri is the Leafs best centre. To suggest that Bozak is better is just ridiculous. Kadri is a better skater and passer, he has a better shot, is more creative, has better hockey sense, is more intelligent on the ice and to top it off, he draws a ton of penalties.

Kadri currently has a CF% of 50(all stats from stats.hockeyanalysis.com) which is spectacular consider the Leafs are one of the worst possession teams in hockey. Every player that he has played 100 minutes of even strength ice time with this season improves their possession rating when he is on the ice.

So not only would I make Kadri my top centre and give him the most ice time on the team among forwards, I’d make him the first centre on the ice on the PP, I’d use him on the PK and I would re-sign him to a six year $36 million dollar deal, of which he’d be worth every penny.

2. Trade Lupul

In order to fit Kadri into the budget, I would then trade Lupul to any team that would take him. I consider any return for him a bonus as I just want to desperately rid myself of his contract.

3. Trade David Clarkson

If you want to trade David Clarkson, you have to get creative. Now, I know that this would be controversial, but I would trade Clarkson, Booth and a first round pick in 2016 to any team that would take him in exchange for a 6th round pick.

It might sound stupid at first, but here me out: A first round pick – assuming you make the playoffs – is not likely to end up as good as Cody Franson who you can retain if make this trade and who you risk losing if you don’t.

4. Re-sign Cody Franson

Cody Franson
If Franson is the Leafs #3, they can easily compete (Tom Szczerbowski-US PRESSWIRE)

I would offer Franson a long-term contract similar to the one Kadri would hopefully accept – around $6 million for five or six years.

5. Trade James Reimer. Re-sign Bernier. Sign random back-up

If my math is wrong,  you’ll have to forgive me since CapGeek.com is no more, but I think that Lupul, Clarkson, Booth, and Reimer add up to a cap hit of approximately $13 million. The current deals of Bernier, Kadri and Franson to $9. Meaning that you can give all three about $6 million per year and still have $4 million left over.  Let’s say one million for the rando back-up and $3 million left over.  Reimer goes for a pick, by the way.

6. Trade Tyler Bozak to the Kings for Mike Richards

Mike Richards would rejuvenate his career with the Leafs (Photo by Bridget Samuels).
Mike Richards would rejuvenate his career with the Leafs (Photo by Bridget Samuels).

Do this deal if the Kings agree to take enough of Richards salary to make it a wash. Maybe they want a second rounder or whatever to spice it up, and to that I say go for it. Richards as the Leafs second-line centre and main penalty killer would be amazing. All the leadership questions would end and the Leafs would have a player who is a great all-round player with tons more offensive upside than Bozak and about one-million times more defensive upside.

7. Scour the League for takers for Polak and Robidas

Robidas might be a great leader, but he’s too much of a liability on the ice to really be effective in the role and his contract is the second or third worst move Dave Nonis ever made. He is clearly no longer even replacement quality, and for that matter, neither is Polak. You’d find a home for Polak no problem, but it may be difficult with Robidas. If I couldn’t move him, I’d make him defensemen number seven and he’d rarely see the ice.

8. Make blockbuster trade with Coyotes

This is the piece de resistance of my entire plan:

I would send James Van Riemsdyke, the 2015 first rounder and Jake Gardiner to the Coyotes for Keith Yandle and Martin Hanzal. Keith Yandle is a possession monster and criminally underrated. He would give the Leafs their long sought elite, number-one defenseman. Hanzal is also underrated and is one of the biggest centres in hockey and one of the toughest down low players.

Yes, it hurts to give up the pick and JVR is great, but he is also one of the worst defensive hockey players in the world and besides, you have to get to give. This trade helps both teams, and the only risk is that Toronto would still miss the playoffs and subsequently win the draft lottery. I don’t think they’ll miss with Yandle in the fold, so I’d go ahead and try it.

Final Result:

The final results of my eight step plan would be as follows:

Forward:         Holland –  Kadri –     Kessel 

                             Santorelli – Richards – Nylander (next year; mix and match for now) 

                           Komarov  – Hanzal –    Pannik

                              Ashton-     Smith –     Leivo 

Defence:         Yandle – Phaneuf

                          Rielly  – Franson

                         Percy –     Grandberg 

Goal: Bernier,  Rando Backupski 


It is my belief that this team would be far superior to the current Leafs team. For one, Yandle and Richards would settle all the questions about character and leadership, as well as making the Leafs a vastly superior possession team. Beyond that, I don’t think you’d lose a step at all swapping out guys like Lupul for Holland or Clarkson for Pannik.  Down the middle the team is as solid as its ever been and depending on Kadri’s ability to run with the top line job, potentially as good as all but a few teams in the NHL.  The defense is fast, mobile and extremely adept at moving the puck. Overall it’d be a fast team with just enough grit, one I think could compete.

To top it all off, the Leafs would be in far superior cap position which would allow them to adjust this roster going forward.

Could this team compete for a Cup? I think it’d be one of the best teams in hockey.

6 thoughts on “Leafs Can Be Cup Competitors Without Rebuilding”

  1. 1. Even adding a 1st next year I doubt anyone touches Clarkson without the Leafs retaining salary or taking a lesser overpriced contract back. If his deal had been heavily front loaded (so that actual dollars owed was much less than cap hit in remaining years) then I could see a team with an internal cap maybe doing something like that; still unlikely though.

    2. The kinds wouldn’t make that deal if it hinged on them retaining salary. I’m sure they want out from under Richards deal but the point of that would be to aquire cap space to resign Williams and Kopitar who are UFA’s this and next off seasons respectively. If Richards is moved it will almost for sure be after the season (so they can use him for another cup run) to a team with cap space in need of a vet (Islanders, Panthers, Oilers etc). Also I know he had a NTC but not sure if that was negated after his trade from Philly to LA; heard rumours both ways on that.

    3. The Leafs-Coyotes deal makes a lot of sense for Toronto, not sure how exactly Airzona benefits.
    Yandle > JVR
    Hanzel > Gardiner (currently, I guess Gardiner could progress but I’m not a fan of his)
    2015 1st > Nothing.
    Barring it being a top 10 pick I don’t think that the 2015 1st makes up the difference. Arizona won’t want to trade 2 of their most established players and leaders, who are signed for 3+ years after this one on below market level deals for a player you call one of the worst defensive players in the world (albiet one who does score) and a depth dman. There would be a better deal out there at the draft for Yandle alone.

    4. Even I’m wrong on the above 3 points and everything that goes exactly to plan that team is no more than a marginal playoff team that would undoubtably bounced in the first rd. Wing depth is atrocious, any team with Peter Holland on the 1st line will not contend for a cup. Saying things like “mix and match” with no options (unless Pannik on the 2nd is an option?) for your 2nd line does not inspire confidence, even with Nylander *probably* being in the NHL next year relying on a rookie to turn you into cup contdenders in a reach. He looks like he’ll be good but will likely get pushed around (like most rookies) until he has a few years to add some size.

    In conclusion I don’t think the things you’ve proposed are even possible but even if they are the resulting team is better than the current leafs, but not better than a lot of teams. Nowhere near a cup contender.

  2. Polak is mobile, defensively conscious and hard on opponents. Let’s just give away our only defender with those qualities. Nonsense.

Comments are closed.