In the NHL, leadership isn’t always smooth sailing. Teams can have a variety of strong personalities, each with their own ideas about how tasks should be accomplished. And sometimes, those big egos don’t exactly see eye to eye. When that happens, it can create tension in the locker room, and that tension often spills onto the ice.
Related: Canucks 2025-26 Opponent Preview: Calgary Flames
The recent drama with J.T. Miller and head coach Rick Tocchet on the Vancouver Canucks is a perfect example. It shows that even talented teams can struggle if the leaders aren’t on the same page. Vancouver’s story garnered a lot of attention due to its passionate fans and the media spotlight. Still, honestly, this kind of thing probably happens more often than we realize across the NHL.
With that in mind, here’s a deeper look at what went wrong in Vancouver—how two strong personalities, both respected in their own right, were never built to last in the same room.
With Two Alphas in the Room, Miller & Tocchet Were Never Built to Last
Almost two weeks ago, we wrote our first post on this highly-charged topic: Miller, Tocchet, and a Canucks breakup that was looming. The tension was there—on the bench, in the locker room, and for anyone paying attention, in the air. The article dug into that friction, exploring what felt like an inevitable split. This follow-up goes further. Not only has the breakup already happened, but we’re now reflecting on why the partnership never worked in the first place.
Interestingly, when this issue first arose, many perceived it as a conflict between Elias Pettersson and Miller. But looking back, it seems wiser to say that the problem wasn’t really focused on Pettersson at all. Instead, it was more about the fallout from the clash between two strong personalities—Miller and Tocchet.
Related: Evander Kane Grows From Controversy to Community Leader
What sets this narrative apart is that it’s not just speculation; it’s a deeper reflection about the Canucks. It digs beneath the surface to explore leadership dynamics, culture clashes, and everything in between. Most importantly, looking back, it raises the bigger question in Vancouver: Were Miller and Tocchet ever truly on the same page, or were they buying time until things inevitably fell apart?
With Miller and Tocchet, Fire Met Ice: A Partnership Destined to Fizzle
When Tocchet was brought in midway through the 2022–23 season, the mission was clear: tighten the team up. Build structure. Demand accountability. After years of spinning their wheels, the Canucks needed a culture reboot. When he arrived, Tocchet inherited the fiery, emotional, and ultra-competitive Miller. The guy’s game speaks for itself, and early on, he looked like a natural fit for Tocchet’s no-nonsense approach.
But here’s the thing: they were never quite pulling in the same direction. Tocchet wanted discipline. Miller brought passion—sometimes a little too much of it. Defensive lapses, sideline blow-ups, heated exchanges with teammates… it all started to feel like his style was clashing with Tocchet’s message. You could see it on the bench during games. Miller had pivoted away from the ice and engaged in mid-game “conversations” with his head coach.
Related: Elias Pettersson Vows to Lead the Canucks Reset: Can He Do It?
In the aftermath, Canucks fans noticed. Comments such as “Tocchet talks all about accountability and culture… what does he do? Abandons ship,” and “They should have traded Miller, the locker room malcontent, years ago” (a reader’s comment from the original article’s discussion section) show that frustration was widespread. This isn’t just about a cold streak. It’s about watching the same story play out year after year—mixed signals from leadership and a team never quite sure what it wants to be.
The Miller Trade Made It Real for the Canucks
On Jan. 31, 2025, the Canucks made it official: Miller was traded to the New York Rangers, along with Erik Brännström and prospect Jackson Dorrington. In return, Vancouver received Filip Chytil, Victor Mancini, and a first-round pick. Miller waived his no-move clause to make it happen—something he’d resisted for over a year. But this time, it felt different—a silenced admission from both sides: this wasn’t working anymore.
General manager Patrik Allvin called it a move that was best for both parties. Executive-speak, sure, but the subtext was clear: the room couldn’t hold both egos anymore. And within a few months, Tocchet was out too, a former Jack Adams Award-winning coach stepping away after the team’s season had ended, citing “family and personal priorities.” The writing on the wall became clear: the Canucks had been caught in a power struggle—one that only resolved itself by hitting “reset” and starting over.
With the Canucks, Too Many Leaders, Not Enough Alignment
The lesson is simple: NHL or life. You can’t have two people steering the same ship if they disagree on where it should be going. Tocchet and Miller both had strong voices, and each led in their way. But that’s not always a good thing. Miller wore his emotions on his sleeve—loud, intense, and unfiltered. Tocchet was more methodical—a systems guy who wanted buy-in from top to bottom. He didn’t say everything he thought, but you could almost see it in his eyes in his post-game media scrums.
Related: Vancouver Canucks Calling: Carey Price, Please Come Home
They might’ve respected each other, but respect doesn’t always mean chemistry. Behind the scenes, who knows what happened? Still, the outcome suggests that tensions boiled over. Rumors swirled about locker room friction—not just between Miller and Tocchet but also between Miller and Pettersson. That rift grew wide enough that management couldn’t ignore it. The message was clear: the culture Tocchet wanted couldn’t survive with Miller at its center.
With Miller and Tocchet Gone, Is This a New Canucks Era—or Just a New Look?
Now that both Miller and Tocchet are gone, the Canucks are turning the page. Quinn Hughes gets to step up as captain, bringing a calm, thoughtful, and consistent presence to the team. Pettersson, still the team’s most-skilled player, now has more room to lead in his way. He’s vowed to have a different season in 2025-26. Meanwhile, when healthy, goaltender Thatcher Demko provides the quiet backbone that every contender needs.
Add in new head coach Adam Foote, and this feels like a complete reboot. Whether it sticks remains to be seen. Meanwhile, Miller got off to a strong start in New York (35 points in 32 games). He looked re-energized, fitting well in the Rangers’ system and giving them the emotional spark they were missing. Sometimes, a breakup is genuinely best for both parties.
Were Miller and Tocchet Ever Truly Aligned?
After reflecting on this recent Canucks saga, one question lingers: Were Miller and Tocchet ever really working toward the same vision—or were they just two alphas trying to lead a team in opposite directions? The second question is: How can a team’s leadership team avoid a similar situation?
Maybe Miller and Tocchet were both right. Perhaps they were both wrong. But either way, the Canucks had to make a radical choice. And now we’ll see if they made the right choice. For Miller and Tocchet, the Canucks are now in their rearview mirror.
A Final Thought About the Issues Involved in NHL Leadership
The Canucks’ experience last season shows what can happen when two alpha personalities share the same locker room—it just doesn’t always work out. Sure, there are times when teams overcome those clashes and even turn them into success stories. However, Vancouver’s situation serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating that these dynamics can often lead to serious problems.
Related: 4 Young Players the Canucks Gave Up on Too Soon
Looking back at other cases around the NHL, one has to wonder how frequently this kind of leadership friction occurs. And if it’s more common than we think, then credit has to go to the teams that manage to make it work despite the challenges involved.
[Note: I’d like to thank Brent Bradford (PhD) for his help co-authoring this post. His profile can be found at www.linkedin.com/in/brent-bradford-phd-3a10022a9]
