Story Not Complete – Habs Scratch Surface in 2013-2014

 

“Remember, it’s going to be a long year. We’re going to have some ups and downs. It’s not going to be rosy all the time. But we need to stick together all the time. Through the good, and the bad, we stick together.”

That was the message from Marc Bergevin to the Montreal Canadiens in September, prior to the commencement of his club’s 2013-14 regular season. For the most part, and thanks in large part to a strong leadership core and an experienced coaching staff captained by Michel Therrien, all on-ice personnel complied with their general manager’s instruction. Had they not complied, I am hard-pressed to believe “Le Tricolore” would have overcame a delicate tailspin of losses in December that had them on the wrong side of lopsided games (6-0 vs KINGS, 5-1 vs BLUES and 5-0 vs CAPITALS). Had they not complied, I’m not sure we would have seen this team embrace the uphill challenge that had them facing elimination in games 6 and 7 against the Boston Bruins in the second round of the playoffs.

Dale Weise

Weise Celebrates (Winslow Townson-USA TODAY Sports)

Following a tumultuous 2013-14 hockey season that saw the Montreal Canadiens continuously bouncing back when poor performances, or an adverse stretch of games would rear their ugly heads, I have selected five moments (let’s call them “turning points”) that I believe set the stage for their lengthy run toward Lord Stanley’s coveted mug.

The Revival of David Desharnais & Max Pacioretty

After brutal starts to the season that saw David Desharnais recording just 1 assist through his first 19 games, and Max Pacioretty recording just 4 points in his first 12 games, Habs fans [including Montreal Mayor, Denis Cordere] elected to give up on them. Meanwhile, inside the Canadiens dressing room, that was far from the case. The team rallied around these two players, and once both of them started producing, neither one looked back.

Defeating The Defending Champs

Coming off a difficult stretch of games at the end of December and in the first week of January, the Canadiens defeated the defending Cup Champs on home ice by a score of 2-1. In what was clearly a “measuring stick game” at the time, this game had a “playoff feel” to it. Winning this tight checking game in overtime provided the Habs with confidence, and set the stage for other big performances against “top opponents” during the second half of the season.

The Olympic Experience

Not only is it an honor to represent your country at the Olympics, but when you are surrounded with the best of the best, you gain inspiration and you learn to comport yourself like a winner. Not only did Carey Price and P.K. Subban return from the Sochi Olympics with Gold Medals, the pair returned with a hunger to keep on winning. I believe that upon their return to Montreal, these experiences brought unity into the Habs dressing room.

(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

Marc Bergevin’s Vote of Confidence

After his team battled through adversity all season long [more often than not responding positively under arduous circumstances], Marc Bergevin shocked the hockey world by acquiring arguably the biggest available fish that was available on the trade market. Despite being ineffective against the New York Rangers in round number 3 of the Stanley Cup playoffs, at the time the Vanek acquisition represented a vote of confidence from the general manager to his players. This move inspired the Montreal Canadiens in every possible way, and for a while, all four forward lines benefited [directly and indirectly] upon Vanek’s arrival.

It should be noted that while the trade to bring in Thomas Vanek received the most attention at the time, it is arguable that the subtle additions of Mike Weaver and Dale Weise actually paid more dividends down the stretch.

Vanek and the Canadiens are still playing in the postseason (Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports )

Vanek and the Canadiens are still playing in the postseason (Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports )

The Comeback Kids

Saturday March 15th – After a tough couple of games on the west coast, and a playoff spot not yet assured, the Canadiens found themselves down 4-1 with 3:22 to go in the 3rd period against the Ottawa Senators. The Habs rallied to tie the game as David Desharnais scored with a mere 0.03 seconds to go. Francis Bouillon scored the winning goal in overtime to complete the improbable comeback. Many close to the Canadiens will point to this comeback and say that it was the most significant turning point leading  them into the playoffs. On April 4th in Ottawa, the Canadiens would erase another 3-goal deficit against the Senators en route to a 7-4 victory.

Unfortunately, the sad reality is that only one organization is truly satisfied when all is said and done at the end of every hockey season. That’s not just a cliché. It is a reality.

So amidst the jubilation felt by the New York Rangers and their fans at Madison Square Garden when time expired on the Eastern Conference Final on Thursday night, the Montreal Canadiens players, coaches, executives, and fans could only watch as they felt feelings of devastation and regret. That is only normal.

As Habs management and players get back to the drawing board this summer (that board will likely be in an office at the Bell Sports Complex in Brossard, or in the gym of an offseason home), all members of the organization will be pushing to achieve hockey’s ultimate prize in 2014-15. Believe me, as much as the players talk about this year’s playoff run being positive in every which way (and it was), they all realize that they missed out on a glorious opportunity.

But despite failing to attain their goal this year, let me remind you that there are a plethora of reasons why every Montreal Canadiens fan in the world should be smiling from ear to ear preceding their team’s trip to a second conference final in five seasons.

Reason 1: Carey Price is 27 years young

Reason 2: P.K. Subban is 24 years young

Reason 3: Max Pacioretty is 25 years young

Reason 4: You’re just a fan without an ability to influence the outcome of games. So might as well just sit back, smile, and look forward to next season.

Reason 5: Brendan Gallagher is 22 years young

Reason 6: Nathan Beaulieu is 20 years young

Reason 7: Jarred Tinordi is 21 years young

Reason 8: Alex Galchenyuk is 20 years young

There you have it, folks. The core pieces that make up your Montreal Canadiens are not simply good: they are young, and VERY good. The window for winning a championship is just beginning to open, and there is reason to believe that this core will only improve moving forward.

Having been educated by the Chicago Blackhawks organization, under the tutelage of Stan and Scotty Bowman, Habs GM Marc Bergevin is following the very same model (drafting and developing properly) that has put the Blackhawks in a position to contend for the Stanley Cup every single year. Marc Bergevin was not hired by the Montreal Canadiens to build a team that could have one or two cracks at winning the Stanley Cup. Instead, his mandate is to put the Canadiens organization in a position to have success year in and year out, an expectation that was a norm when Sam Pollock was in his position some 40 years ago. With the seven players mentioned above, I believe the Canadiens are well on their way to solidifying this desired foundation.

(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

Naturally there might very well be some more growing pains along the way, and with expectation levels surely to increase going into next year, there is always a chance that a team in Montreal’s situation could take a step backwards. However, I believe the art of winning is something that is learned via trial and error. As they did during this year’s regular season and playoffs, the Canadiens players usually responded the right way and with the right attitude whenever their backs were against the wall. Similarly, if this year’s experience of “falling short” is used positively and constructively moving forward, the Habs could be a dangerous animal once again next season.

I’m not going to put a timetable on this, nor will I cushion the following with a “guarantee” (nothing is ever guaranteed in sport and in life), but when you’ve been a winner in hockey the way Carey Price and P.K. Subban have been throughout their lives, I believe it’s only a matter of time until you crack the code at the NHL level. More often than not, winners find a way to win. That is why they hold such a reputation. The road to getting there might be longer and bumpier than it was (or will be) for other stars, but if you are a winner, usually you find a way.

I believe the Montreal Canadiens will win their 25th Stanley Cup soon, and when it is won, Carey Price and P.K. Subban will be front and center.

(Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports)

(Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports)

 

David P. Stein
David is currently a second year Arts student at McGill University and aspires to have a career as a sports journalist one day. When he's not covering the Montreal Canadiens for THW, he is the sports producer for TVMcGill and the host of his very own show called "On The Line with David Stein." He is also a frequent contributor to the McGill Tribune.
David P. Stein

5 Comments

  1. Mister,

    You seem to omit the fact that I specified that we will have extra cap space to go out and sign some vets…preferably with some size and skill and grit and add it into our young core. Anyhow, I won’t go line by line through your pathetic answer, but obviously you didn’t read or understand the many layers to how I see us improving. You have your way of thinking, I have mine. I believe my philosophy is the right one for this team at this time.

  2. Terrible analysis by Jon. What he doesn’t seem to realize is that the core is already in place with most of our best players being in their early to mid 20s. How does loosing benefit these guys? How can they gain experience? Confidence?

    The Edmonton model of re-building doesn’t work; you need someone to teach the kids. That’s how the Red Wings were so good for so long. Did Boston and LA (recent cup winners) finish last year after year to build contenders? No. It did work for Chicago and Pittsburgh but loosing year after year isn’t for the Habs. Even if Chicago drafted high, their success is due to their depth that support the stars. As for Pittsburgh, they are a team in trouble with too much money going to too few players. They have several needs but no cap space to address it without trading at least one of their $5M+/year players.

    Sure, we are a few pieces short of being contenders but there’s no need to suck for several years to get there; no deed to risk damaging the young players that we already have.

  3. yaaa, right. I KNOW hockey a lot better than you goof….been a player, and fan for over 40 yrs. Ive seen all the habs through that time..the good, the bad and the ugly. I think you have zero clue about what winning cup teams actually look like, how they are structured, developed, how they mature, etc..etc..etc…

  4. Another year kidding ourselves… We are only slightly better off despite winning two rounds of fun to watch playoff hockey …we will once again draft near the end of the pile, in every round ….we did not get rid of useless vets to build future assets preferring instead to try and reach for the fantasy we always live every single year…we have become a team that just wants to get into the show where “anything can happen” and usually doesn’t. Its a losers mentality and its NOT what the Montreal Canadiens organizational philosophy ought to be. Geoff Molson has enough money. He doesn’t NEED a round or two of playoff money to keep him afloat. What he does need are championships. There are nothing like championships to increase the value of his investment.

    I would have much rather not had any playoffs to watch knowing that the team was going to be made better for the two to three years out. But that’s just me. I want to win as badly as the next fan, but I want to have a REALISTIC chance year in year out, not some vegas type odds to strike gold “if we just get in”.

    Instead we held onto plekanec, who is a nice little player but who gives some other teams more value given where they currently are than he gives us in our particular point of development. He is 31, makes 5.5 and is the player who gets us the most back in any trade. We likely won’t win a cup with pleks anytime soon, so holding onto him while he gets older, at his salary, just makes no sense given our needs and where the team is at. We held onto Gionta, Markov, Moen, Boullion, Murray, Briere, some of whom played well, but in reality, who cares! What did we win with them? Not much. We are past due to get rid of all the older veterans, the non-performing veterans, the overpaid veterans and maybe even guys like Pacioretty who despite having a very friendly contract, is a fluffy perimeter type player. I like him but he can be used to get back the type of hard nose playoff player this team desperately needs. Vanek can obviously go and I would also let go of prust even though I like the guy. For toughness we can keep white , weise and sign another player of that ilk. The time has come to lean out this team.

    Go young, suck for a year, stockpile draft picks, draft higher(in every round) because we suck, go with price, subban, gorges, weaver, beaulieu, tinordi, emelin, pateryn, dd, gallagher, galchenyuk, eller, weise, bourneval, white and sign a few fa’s (from the cash we free up from pleks,gio, markov and others)to get us through a year or 2 until our prospects are ready…and we do have some that are good and may be really good but they need another 1-3 yrs.

    If Bergevin has any guts at all, he would forego the need to get some measly cash back to Molson from a round or 2 of playoffs, and build this team as it ought to be built, on solid young legs, with proper cap space management, prospect development, good drafting, and a few key FA additions as we need along the way. Next year is a DEEP draft, I would suggest Bergevin position himself and this team accordingly.

    I don’t mind losing for a year or two in order to be a lot better in three.

    • Spoken like someone who has no clue how hockey works, has no idea how a team functions, and has no idea what winning ACTUALLY means.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required Email Address * Name Email Format html text mobile