The Toronto Maple Leafs skated out of TD Gardens last night with a convincing 4-1 win over the Boston Bruins. After a season where the Bruins beat on the Maple Leafs, the nature of the win was
Thought One: Speed & Pressure Wins
I have thought all season long that Kyle Dubas has a vision of the kind of team he wants his Maple Leafs to be. I think he wants the team’s top three lines to be speed-driven, offensive forces that create so much pressure that they simply overwhelm the other team.
We saw some of that speed in Game 1, and it wasn’t only on offense. The Maple Leafs burst into the offensive zone quickly, which has been their game all season. However, the team’s first goal came when they crashed the net, pounced on a rebound, and slapped it past the Bruins’ goalie.
But, impressively the Maple Leafs used their speed on
As Muzzin noted, “You pressure them, and you can force turnovers and fumbled pucks.” If I am hearing the sub-text to Muzzin’s comment correctly, he’s thinking “just like any other team.” The Bruins are mortal and the Maple Leafs can beat them if they play well. What they did tonight is repeatable.
Related – Leafs vs. Bruins: Rivalry Renewed
Mitch Marner noted, “We know we’re a fast team in this locker room.” Marner added, ”I think we know when we play right, it’s hard to stop us.” Again, the
Thought Two: Frederik Andersen Was Stong; Tuukka Rask Not So Much
Frederik Andersen looked like the goalie he was at the beginning of the season. He was calm and organized, stopping 37 shots. His stellar play in the second period turned a shot disadvantage into a two-goal lead for his team. I say “organized,” because Andersen seemed to know exactly where to position himself to take maximum advantage of his size and skill.
On the other hand, Rask made some good saves but looked disorganized. He stopped 29 of 32 shots, but he didn’t look relaxed. Surprisingly, announcer Jim Hughson and analyst Craig Simpson seemed to keep applauding Rask’s skill in keeping his team in the game.
Granted, Rask made a pair of saves in the final minute of period two to keep the Maple Leafs from making the game a blowout. However, I thought Rask was too frenetic and made saves with his face mask, his shoulders, everywhere. I suppose a save is a save, but I don’t think he’s nearly as good a goalie as Andersen is and might be one of the Bruins’ exploitable weak links.
Thought Three: Zdeno Chara Used to Play Better
Speaking of possible weak links, Zdeno Chara looked old and slow. People expect that of Ron Hainsey, but tonight Hainsey played a far better game than his grizzled-veteran competitor Chara. Connor Brown went around him like he was standing still, and only an interference penalty kept William Nylander from blowing by him, as well.
After one whistle, Marner bumped into Chara and you could see just how huge Chara is in comparison to Marner. However, in this
Thought Four: William Nylander Cares
Nylander not only scored on a great pass from Nazem Kadri, but played hard all game. In one notable sequence, he battled hard for a puck and won behind the net – all while laying on the ice when his opponents were standing over him. He showed desire and speed all game.
Thought Five: John Tavares Is a Smart Hockey Player
With just over a minute left in the game, John Tavares and Patrice Bergeron met for a neutral-zone faceoff. Instead of Tavares trying to win the faceoff to pull the puck behind him, Tavares and Bergeron both tipped the puck the same direction. Tavares was ready, grabbed the loose puck, and scored an empty-net goal. Smart hockey.
Thought Six: Auston Matthews Is Big, Strong & Fast
Auston Matthews might not have made the scoresheet, but his speed and craftiness with the puck made him formidable. He skated through and around Bruin defenders and, were it not for a post, might have scored. When he had the puck, the Bruins were on their heels.
Thought Seven: Mitch Marner Is Cool-headed
Marner’s penalty shot was beautiful. But the penalty he drew was as nice. He tipped the puck into
Thought Nine: Nazem Kadri Is a Disruptor
Kadri might just be the difference in this
But later Kadri couldn’t keep from riling up the Bruins by yelling across the benches, until coach Mike Babcock intervened and – you could read his lips – told Kadri to “please, be quiet” or something like that. Although I get Babcock’s point, I think Kadri must play just that way to be most effective. He threw his body around all night, and had some punishing hits.
Thought Ten: The Fourth Line Made a Difference
The fourth line played less than seven minutes together, but what an impact. They hit, they annoyed, they did their job. Noting the box score and the ice time the trio of Brown, Trevor Moore, and Frederik Gauthier played, I noticed them lots more than they played. Brown always was disrupting, as was Moore. I saw Gauthier take one faceoff, but didn’t notice him much at all. Perhaps that’s good.
Thought Eleven: The Defense Played Well
This was the best game I think I remember Nikita Zaitsev playing. He was strong on the boards and was able to break up Bruins’ offensive bursts. Hainsey seemed to play more
Game 2 is Saturday night at TD Garden, and then the Maple Leafs head home for games on Monday and Wednesday. This victory, although a good one for the Maple Leafs, might mean little if the team doesn’t continue to play with the same willful determination. The Bruins have a good team and are more than capable of coming back, just as they did last season’s playoffs.
The Old Prof (Jim Parsons, Sr.) taught for more than 40 years in the Faculty of Education at the University of Alberta. He’s a Canadian boy, who has two degrees from the University of Kentucky and a doctorate from the University of Texas. He is now retired on Vancouver Island, where he lives with his family. His hobbies include playing with his hockey cards and simply being a sports fan – hockey, the Toronto Raptors, and CFL football (thinks Ricky Ray personifies how a professional athlete should act).
If you wonder why he doesn’t use his real name, it’s because his son – who’s also Jim Parsons – wrote for The Hockey Writers first and asked Jim Sr. to use another name so readers wouldn’t confuse their work.
Because Jim Sr. had worked in China, he adopted the Mandarin word for teacher (老師). The first character lǎo (老) means “old,” and the second character shī (師) means “teacher.” The literal translation of lǎoshī is “old teacher.” That became his pen name. Today, other than writing for The Hockey Writers, he teaches graduate students research design at several Canadian universities.
He looks forward to sharing his insights about the Toronto Maple Leafs and about how sports engages life more fully. His Twitter address is https://twitter.com/TheOldProf