Subban Not Ready to Lead

P.K. Subban and Andrei Markov
(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

It took the bulk of summer but All-Star defenseman P.K. Subban finally earned his pay day in the form of a long term deal with the Montreal Canadiens.  The 8 year, $72 million contract is what most expected, so much so that many had already pegged Subban to replace the departed Brian Gionta as the next Habs captain.

There have been many arguments in favour of Subban wearing the honoured “C”.  The Hockey Writers’ own David P. Stein and Marc Dumont over at Eyes on the Prize  both made compelling cases; and armed with a contract that will take him to the 2021-2022 season, Subban has the longest term of any Montreal Canadiens player, making him a ripe candidate from a management perspective.

I just hope management is smart enough to realize that naming Subban captain next season would be a mistake.

It’s not that I feel Subban is too young to be captain.  There are plenty of young captains in the NHL who have disproved that argument.  It’s because the honour of becoming an NHL captain should be more than simply winning a popularity contest or the lottery.  It is about getting the best out of your team.

The Lost Meaning of the “C”



The position of NHL captain used to be one of the most important in professional sports. Players were singled out as the best representatives of their organization.  They held themselves to a certain standard both on and off the ice; were expected to be role models, media liaisons, ever-ready for fans, all while looking out for the team’s and their teammates’ best interests on the ice.

It is a demanding position, or used to be. Perhaps I’m too traditional, holding tightly to old notions of greatness that no longer exist; but those are the standards to which any captain should be held responsible.

In the Salary Cap Era NHL captaincies have defaulted to the player signed to the longest contract, because they are considered worth the investment.  As a result, more often than not, a team’s captain is also its star player, as we see in Pittsburgh with Sidney Crosby or Jonathan Toews in Chicago.   These two are franchise players, exceptional talents who are also  born leaders.  That isn’t always the case when Dollars are handed out like candy (Dion Phaneuf in Toronto comes to mind); and somehow even Crosby’s ability to lead continues to be questioned, because unmatched talent does not always translate into great leadership.

Subban the Rising Star

(Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports)
(Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports)

Without question, Subban is the face of the Montreal Canadiens (Price is a close second), and a leading figure in the NHL.

To his credit, the 25 year old defenseman has taken every challenge thrown at him and come out ahead.  He is a Norris trophy winner, an All Star, an Olympian; he is a leading defensive scorer, a candid interview, and always willing to share himself for the love of the sport:

Those are the traits of an NHL ambassador certainly, and an important role for any captain, but it does not necessarily make him an on-ice leader.

By my definition, wearing the “C” for hockey’s most recognizable franchise should not be about flashy interviews; it should not be about stars.  It should be about composure and accountability, it should be Bob Gainey instead of Larry Robinson or Dustin Brown instead of Drew Doughty:  responsible players that teach and encourage, not shoulder the burden; and this is where I think Subban falls short.

Subban Still Learning

(Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports)
(Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports)


In 2012, Dave Unger, at the Bleacher Report, summed up what I still believe to be one of the most important responsibilities of an NHL captain:

The captain might not be the best player on the team, but you can bet that he will be the most knowledgeable about the game, the subtle intricacies and nuances and he will know the strengths and weaknesses of his team better than anyone else.

This is how leaders and captains win championships.  It’s how players like Gainey and Jean Béliveau led by example: by understanding their team and the game so well that they could get the best out of any player on the ice.  It’s how Brown continues to lead despite diminishing point totals.

My biggest problem with Subban becoming the next Habs captain is the way he interprets the game, not as a player but as a leader and what becoming the voice of the Canadiens might do to his game.

A Captain’s Responsibility

There is no comparable defenseman to Subban, in terms of creativity and instinctual play.  He plays from the heart not the head.  It’s what fans love about him.  His game is centered on split second decisions that factor into his game and his game alone.  It is also why in 2013-2014 Subban was the third most penalized player on the Habs with 81 PIM (only George Parros and Brandon Prust had more): because he’s willing to play on the edge.

The problem here is that each team’s captain has the sole responsibility of dealing with the referees.  Even the beastly Bruins captain Zdeno Chara or the Kings’ Brown had considerably less penalties with 66 PIM apiece, albeit both rank near the bottom of their rosters.  They do, however, have the respect of the referees, something Subban will eventually earn but has yet to accomplish.  It would be a mistake to force him to play a more controlled game just to earn the ears of the refs.

My biggest fear would be to see Subban rein in his game because he has the “C” on his jersey.  His obligations to uphold a level of respect with referees and opponents might easily box him in, as it did Crosby in the playoffs: In Pittsburgh’s second round series loss to the New York Rangers, Crosby stifled his emotions in order to avoid outbursts or bad penalties. It ended up costing his team the benefit of his talents.  The Habs cannot afford, nor should they want, to box in Subban when his game is on the verge of maturity and his prime is still ahead of him.  Players like Subban only get better with age and as they have the room to make mistakes.

And mistakes are still part and parcel of Subban’s game.  He may understand the game’s intricacies and nuances but only filtered through his own style of play. What he sees and what he is capable of on the ice is not teachable.  Think back to last spring and the failed pairing with rookie Jarred Tinordi. For better or worse, and mostly worse, the rookie Tinordi was often left to fend for himself because Subban was unable to play to the level of his ability AND cover a young partner that needed guidance or at least protection.  It is because Subban is also still learning the nuances of the game.  To his credit, he continues to rely on instructions from veteran teammates like Andrei Markov and Tomas Plekanec, who have the poise and understanding of the team’s strengths and weaknesses coupled with the ability to instruct.

Let Him Play

(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)
(Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports)

Give him the “C” and Subban will no longer be the creative spark that scared the pants off Babcock and Therrien last season.  He is still at a young point in his career where, when frustration sets in, he puts the team on his shoulders rather than delegate the burden; he does everything on his own, rather than use the strength of his teammates. His youth, his exceptional ability and his ambitious drive enable him to skate in an endless puck-possession loop without complaints from fans who enjoy the show.

In an ideal world the next Montreal Canadiens captain would be Andrei Markov, who has the vision, experience and loyalty to the organization that would be most effective on the ice. He may not want it, as was the case in 2011, but he would be the best choice.  Tomas Plekanec would be my second choice for similar reasons.  They may not be the interview everyone craves but they carry the team with pride and instruction, and would be capable of  turning an increasingly young lineup into winners.

Subban just became the most expensive defenseman in the NHL in a City where he is already king.  Why not give him a chance to make mistakes and grow without slapping the “C” on him since, as history proves, mistakes are costly when the CH is on your jersey.

A market-dependent system has made the captaincy expendable or irrelevant.  Long contracts are bought or shipped out, irrespective of the “C”. Spezza lasted one year in Ottawa; long-serving Bolts captain Vincent Lecavalier was bought out by the team that drafted him;  Sabres captain Steve Ott was shipped out in a package deal.  The list goes on.  If becoming an NHL captain no longer carries the weight of responsibility but is simply offered up to the team’s biggest star, then yes, Subban should be captain.

But why not let him prove his game is worth the dollars before we hand him the captaincy.  After all, there’s plenty of time.



9 thoughts on “Subban Not Ready to Lead”

  1. Its a really good Artcile congrats ! I agree with you for PK ‘s inconsistency .

    But like the other bloggers ,I think Subban is the best candidate to be the Captain .
    He’s a born leader and has alot of charisma !

    Subban clearly has everything , except maybe the consistency witch is not that bad if you compare to the average .I think these’s problem pure manageable , many different Ego’s to manage but that’s y coaches are there for . And also there’s to many variables that can play against it .Not going to blame just the player for that .

    Statistically is more constent then any habs player in the team . That argument is for the all team and the staff .

    Y not let him have the C and let him learn ? .
    Markov clearly is not a born leader ,neither then Plekanec.

    So y go for people who doesn’t have that skill ? Yes they have experience and good ethics but we did’nt have much success with both of them when it comes of playoff performance .

    The team as a new image and it’s the time to put there’s face up front . . Price , Pk , Pacioretty ,Gallagher , Galchenyuck ,Eller ,Parenteau , Plekanec as the core of that team and the C should go to one of them in the futur . Plekanec is the front runner and then comes Subban .

    Ps:The Boston Serie’s wasn’t that great for the habs team ( Markov , Emelin ,Gorges , Vanek even do he scored 4 goals wasn’t playing good Hockey ) It was All Subban , Price contributate strongly , Desharnais , Eller and Pleky who did a great job shutting down the two center man , Bergeron( best player on the bruise team ) and Krejci .And the Hard work of Gallagher and Weise help.

    thanks ,

    Keep your good work

  2. I have to agree with this. Subban is without question the habs best player, but countless times in the past he has had dust ups with other Habs (Although this has subsided this past year). Furthermore, Subban has yet to even wear an ‘A’. In my opinion, the biggest reason he should not be captain is that he is still earning the respect of the refs, his own teammates, and other players around the league.

    Any ascension to captaincy would be solely based on his skill and his contract, which is not how a captain should be selected. Look at it another way; if Subban was a second pairing defenceman would he get any consideration whatsoever for captaincy of this team? No he would not. Simply because he is #1 on the depth chart and #1 in the hearts of many fans does not mean that he should wear the ‘C’, that is not what captaincy is about. Let him wear an A and let him prove he is ready for captaincy. I agree with this article completely.

    • Thanks for your comment. You make a great point about Subban having yet to even be an alternate captain.



  3. You talk as if every captain is the same, having all the same atributes and characteristics. It’s strengths and weaknesses that define every person. Step away from the belief that every captain has uber hockey knowledge, or the ability control the minds of their teamates. These atributes, although a great benefit to any captain, are secondary to the ability to inspire, lead by example and good old work ethic. Subban has everyone of these characteristics in my mind and would make a fine captain. certainly not a big mistake.
    “The position of NHL captain used to be one of the most important in professional sports.”… come on guy, that’s rocking chair mumbo jumbo. What makes the importance of an NHL captain any more than other sports with captains, and less important in today’s NHL? It makes you sound pretentious, not saying you are…. necessarily.
    Lastly, i’m tired of hearing about reigning in young guys, “Oh gotta bring that guy along slow and easy…for his development….make him a better player you see.” …Cookie cutter, regurgitated crappola.
    Stop believing everything you hear Bob Mckenzie and TSN say….in fact, to be on the safe side consider 100% of everything they say to be useless information….the 1% good info you may miss is worth the other 99% that may end up clogging up the mental filter.

    • Thanks for reading and leaving a comment. There’s no question that Subban inspires and has an incredible work ethic, but I stand what I believe to be a good NHL captain, even if it’s an admittedly traditionalist opinion.

      For the record, however, my opinion is not regurgitated TSN speak. It is strictly my opinion based on watching and loving the sport of hockey for over 25 years.



  4. While I agree with some of the points you get across here, I still think Subban is ripe for the “C”.

    First of all, leadership: During the last playoffs against the Bruins, Subban was everywhere and he led his team not with his words (or maybe he did) but at the very least, with his play. He stepped up big and played inspired hockey for his team to draw from. That is the captain’s role. Lead on and off the ice.

    As for the off-ice part, he’s matured a whole lot (see the “Boston-racial” incident, the fact that his interviews took a turn for the “we” rather than the “me”, not making comments about not playing at Olympics or being under-utilized according to a lot of people, and being all class all. the. time.)

    Plus, even though you don’t seem to be a big fan of the “let’s give the “C” to the guy who has the longest contract” factor, it still very well counts. Why give the “C” to Markov if chances are he won’t be playing two years from now (or sooner if his knee gives up).

    Also,it could be a great way to make amends for this farce of a contract negociation MB made him go through. It would finally be a way to say: “Look man, we were tough on you, but we value you and are 100% committed to you. This is your team now, you will lead our young core for years to come. Make the best out of this and make sure everyone rallies behind you.”

    Seems logical to me.
    Great article.

    • Thanks for your comment. You make some great points and the two articles I mentioned in my opening paragraphes argued something similar, which I believe to be strong cases in favour of Subban.

      That said, I stand by MB and my belief that Subban will be a great captain two years from now but not yet. The Boston series was a great feat for the entire team. The Rangers series told a different story.

      Thanks for reading!


  5. I strongly disagree with your contention that PK is not ready to wear the Captains C. Quite frankly the values, which are most desirous of a Captain; courage, commitment and consistency are all who PK is.

    • Thanks for reading. It’s a great topic to debate.

      Subban certainly has courage and commitment but I’m wearing of calling him consistent.

      Thanks for sharing your opinion!


Comments are closed.